But apart from that.
I got the book "The Shack" for Christmas— finally. I read it in a few hours and it was certainly an entertaining read. And it seems to have some very good truths, and provide comfort, and possibly some answers to tough questions. But it's nagging me. It nagged me while I was reading it and as I pondered it afterwards. The whole things is bothersome because I can't put a finger on what's wrong with it. I guess the best way I can put it (and it comes out rather offensively) is that the way the Trinity is describe comes off a little... fake? Weird? Misconstrued? I'm cautious to voice too many questions or criticisms because I think I've become paranoid about the whole "watchmen" thing. I'm afraid I've become overly analytical; perhaps I have been ruined! Ha, just kidding, inside joke. I'm going to read it again (and definitely take my time) and see what I think about it this go round. I know many people have read it and absolutely loved it, which is why I was so excited about it when I opened it on Christmas morning, and I will definitely be posting more questions in the future, for the heck of it.
I feel like my view of God is changing every day. Every day I don't see Him the same as the day before, and as a result it's like my relationship with Father is shifting and moving and setting up new boundaries. Is that good? Or does it make me indecisive? Whenever I read "My Utmost for His Highest" on the rbc website it smacks me in the face. I'm struggling through "Unto Full Stature"... either I haven't gotten to the good parts yet or I'm a moron.

1 comment:
i think that to think of god in a different way is not bad, if your careful. you know what i mean by that. i see Him some days as loving, and others as just, and still others as powerful, all in different ways. maybe i am way off, i don't know. but i like what i read. i think youre on the right track, if you know what i mean ;)
the code is "conial"
Post a Comment